엔포에 정치 성향 분석 관련 글이 올라와 다들 떠들썩했다.
나도 해 봤는데 은근히 질문들이 깊이가 있다. ㅋㅋ
결과는…내가 경제적으로 코뮤니스트에 정치적으로 아나키스트에 가깝단다.
그런데 엔포 회원들 상당수가 다 이런 성향이다.
성향대로라면 엔포 동호회 회원들은 상당수 정치적 동지로 결의할 만하다. ㅡ.ㅡ;
하지만 이게 사실이 아니라는 걸 안다.
아마 이 설문이 지나치게 원론적이거나 우리가 머리 속으로 생각하는 것과 현실을 판단하는 방식에 차이가 많거나, 그 문제일 것 같다.

 

 

About The Political Compass™

In the introduction, we explained the inadequacies of the traditional left-right line.

If we recognise that this is essentially an economic line it’s fine, as faras it goes.We can show, for example, Stalin,Mao Tse Tung and Pol Pot, with their commitment to a totally controlledeconomy, on the hard left. Socialistslike Mahatma Gandhi and Robert Mugabe would occupya less extreme leftist position. Margaret Thatcher would be well over tothe right, but further right still would besomeone like that ultimate free marketeer, General Pinochet.

That deals with economics, but the social dimension is also important inpolitics. That’s the one that the mere left-rightscale doesn’t adequately address.So we’ve added one, ranging in positions from extreme authoritarian toextreme libertarian.

Both an economic dimension and a social dimension are important factors for a proper political analysis. By adding the social dimension you can show that Stalin was an authoritarian leftist (ie the state is more important than the individual) and that Gandhi, believing in the supreme value of each individual, is a liberal leftist. While the former involves state-imposed arbitary collectivism in the extreme top left, on the extreme bottom left is voluntary collectivism at regional level, with no state involved. Hundreds of such anarchist communities exisited in Spain during the civil war period

You can also put Pinochet, who was prepared to sanction mass killing for the sake of the free market, on the far right as well as in a hardcore authoritarian position. On the non-socialist side you can distinguish someone like Milton Friedman, who is anti-state for fiscal rather than social reasons, from Hitler, who wanted to make the state stronger, even if he wiped out half of humanity in the process.

The chart also makes clear that, despite popular perceptions, the oppositeof fascism is not communismbut anarchism (ie liberal socialism), and that the opposite of communism( i.e. an entirely state-planned economy) is neo-liberalism (i.e. extreme deregulated economy).

The usual understanding of anarchism as a left wing ideology does not takeinto account the neo-liberal”anarchism” championed by the likes of Ayn Rand, Milton Friedman andAmerica’s Libertarian Party,which couples law of the jungle right-wing economics with liberal positionson most social issues.Often their libertarian impulses stop short of opposition to strong law andorder positions, and are moreeconomic in substance (ie no taxes) so they are not as extremelylibertarian as they are extremely right wing.On the other hand, the classical libertarian collectivism ofanarcho-syndicalism ( libertarian socialism)belongs in the bottom left hand corner.

In our home page we demolished the myth that authoritarianism is necessarily”right wing”, with the examples ofRobert Mugabe, Pol Pot and Stalin. Similarly Hitler, on an economic scale,was not an extreme right-winger.His economic policies were broadly Keynesian, and to the left of some oftoday’s Labour parties.If you could get Hitler and Stalin to sit down together and avoid economics,the two diehardauthoritarians would find plenty of common ground.

Your political compass

Economic Left/Right: -7.13
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -5.49

Show graph on separate page for printing

Now you know where you are on The PoliticalCompass™, you might like to explore the ideas of those with similar (orwildly differing) views on our Reading List.

International Chart

A diverse professional team has assessed the words and actions ofinternationally known contemporary leaders to give you an idea of howthey relate to each other on the political compass.

We regret the present exclusion of some majorleaders, especially in the developing world. This is due to ourinability so far to contact independent experts.

How You Can Help Us

A great deal of effort lies behind the development of The Political Compass, and the realisation of it in practical form. It has occasionally come to our attention that other sites have tried to exploit our work by copying it, adopting our name, or linking to us in a dishonest fashion.

If you should come across any such sites, please let us know, so that we can take appropriate action.

A few critics believe that we should blow with prevailing political winds and narrow the actual parameters. Please see our FAQ 21.

Thanks from the Political Compass team.

UK Election 2005

A few words about “The Extreme Right”, and a look at the parties in England’s local elections

ICONOCHASMS: How well do you know your political icons ?

New material is regularly added to The Political Compass – please keep coming back !

Last updated: Sunday 5 March 2006

This website copyright © Pace News Limited 2001-2002. All rights reserved.Reproduction in whole or in part in any medium without prior written permissionstrictly prohibited.

출처 : http://myhome.naver.com/deadbird99/political_compass_frame.htm